|
Woman breeds with child rapist
ABC News | Submitted by: kara kirk
"Melissa WolfHawk, due to give birth any day now, lives in fear that her baby will be taken from her by the government. The county child-welfare agency believes her child won't be safe because her husband is a sex offender who spent more than a decade in prison for rape in a case involving two teenage girls." ... "The American Civil Liberties Union, which has taken her side, argued that the county was too aggressive in monitoring her pregnancy and will ask a judge Monday to block the agency from taking the baby." ... "The ACLU argues that officials in Pennsylvania have no right under state law to question Melissa WolfHawk about her unborn baby, and that DaiShin WolfHawk should not be punished further."
|
From: radius
[Nad Man]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 15:06
Ya, sure, he's gonna be a good dad. I'm sure he'll watch little Suzie every moment of the day (and night, when mommy is sleeping).
From: buggerthis [buttercup]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 15:59
O.K.... at first when I saw this story I thought - "What? Is she freakin' nuts or what!?!?" Then I actually READ the story. The crime that he plead guilty to, occurred over 20 years ago. There are no particulars about the crime at all... he could have been drunk at a party and had sex with 2 underage girls... we don't know. The guy hasn't been in trouble with the law since then... that we know of... the article doesn't say that either. Has the state done a psychological evaluation of this guy or are they just assuming that because of his past - he is, and always will be - EVIL? We aren't told that in this article either. Don't get me wrong... I am not defending sex offenders. I'm just saying... what aren't we being told here? If the state has good reason - as in a recent evaluation - that says that this guy is STILL a threat towards children... then by all means - TAKE THEM. But....
From: radius
[Nad Man]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 16:11
From what I understand a pedo is a head case. A lot of them believe sex with kids is Ok and natural and think the rest of us are nuts for being with people our own age. To them, it's natural. That being the case, can you reform someone like that? Probably not. They can supress the urges but can never fully tame them. If he's done this in the past, what's to say he won't do the same thing again? If he was drinking when it happened, what happens when he gats drunk while babysitting his kids?
From: albinotreefrog
[life's funny like that]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 16:24
there are alot of worse things than getting knocked up by a sex offender like getting knocked up by your mexican boyfriend like me for example i guess what it all comes down to is her own choice, if she trusts him enough then the damn people need to leave her alone...doesnt the government have better things to do than interfer with people lives nah i guess not...interfering with people lives is what the government does best
From: blissfulgirl
[~^-^~]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 16:31
Something does not seem quite complete about this story...like they haven't given enough details...the crimes were over 20 years ago the girls are described vaguely as "teenagers" which could be 13 or could be 19...they don't say what grounds they used to apprehend the 21 month old baby girl...this "couple" doesn't even actually live together so how does he pose any more of a threat than any other sex offender if they don't actually live together? With the vague info they've given and by the logic they're using any woman who happened to live in the same community as a sex offender OR who has a family member who is a sex offender should have her children apprehended. There must be a whole lot more to this story that we aren't getting because as it is, it doesn't seem logical.
From: ropetoker [manic digressive]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 16:32
Albinotreefrog; abort abort abort.
From: albinotreefrog
[life's funny like that]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 16:38
lol too late for that, as if this country didnt have enough of those bean eating bastards around...i get to help usher in a whole new era of lazy wetbacks...love my boyfriend and his family to death but i think i owe an apology to the world.... "I AM SO SORRY THAT MY DECSENDENTS ARE GONNA BE A DRAIN ON THE AMERICAN ECONOMY" lol the official apology from the albinotreefrog... ;)
From: anaisnun [Anais Nun]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 16:52
Anyone read the story directly above? Why isn't the state (different state, but who cares)freaking out to the same degree to a demented mother who is actually brutally, flagrantly injuring her babies? If she's been convicted of brutality on her older children, why was she allowed to keep another baby who she ended up nearly killing? Seems like there are some fucked up priorities somewhere.
From: albinotreefrog
[life's funny like that]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 17:00
anaisnun i dont think people will ever know why its so fucked up...i guess its some sort of low keyed favoritism depending on the situation at hand, people dont make sense when it comes to this kind of shit, hell i'll joke about my damn mexican family in good fun, but what if my situation was different? like my going to be husband got accused of this kind of bullshit way back, makes me wonder if they would act differently in his situation? maybe some pathetic little ploy on race that the media seems so fond of...yeah i know not the "racism card" but hey you gotta look at it from all angles i guess?
From: melvin69 [John Bong]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 17:16
With social workers, it is a matter if they are victims of being molested or for some, untouched. You get these people in child services that have had a screwed up childhood and now they need to protect the children like they never were. Those people are the worse kinds, they see abuse and molestation where it doesn't exist. There are a few stable social workers, but that's a few.
From: boethius09
[Baker Girl]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 17:42
lol too late for that, as if this country didnt have enough of those bean eating bastards around...i get to help usher in a whole new era of lazy wetbacks...love my boyfriend and his family to death but i think i owe an apology to the world.... "I AM SO SORRY THAT MY DECSENDENTS ARE GONNA BE A DRAIN ON THE AMERICAN ECONOMY" lol the official apology from the albinotreefrog... ;) Umm... I wouldn't be so worried about your Mexican boyfriend screwing up your kids...
From: 420nydialoves420 [pedophiles are f****** immature assholes]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 17:49
Every one is giving this two much thought. I bet she loves anal. What a sick bitch. I would never give a sodomizing , child rapist the time of day. I wonder if she has all her teeth? That's all the thought I'm giving this piece of news.
From: necrophiliac [coldone]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 17:51
ya! let's put a baby into the hands of a child molester. bet the baby doesn't live long.
From: blahblahblah [glkjfdgdflkj]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 18:02
But thankfully the government is trying to keep the gays from getting married, Right guys?? The sanctity of marriage needs to be protected but straight child rapists can step right up
From: albinotreefrog
[life's funny like that]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 18:07
honestly people are sick when it comes to this whole thing, who the hell in their right mind gives a baby to a man accused of that kind of shit, there is no concrete evidence saying that he did it or not, hell i agree with the people who say it probably happend when they was drunk, but the thing is he was still tried for it, better safe than sorry right? america is fucked up enough as it is with all the molestors and rapists, why give someone the opportunity to act on their impulses? I guess you could say that america is going to hell with stupid shit like this, that takes more than one trial to figure out, still though i dont think they should take the baby from the mother, just remove the man from the picture temporarily till this gets all figured out. reading all this shit on the rotten forums makes moving to mexico seem even better than i first thought lol boethius09, hey dont worry about me screwing my kid up, i only mean the whole mexican thing in fun, nothing but pregnancy jitters lol
From: barghest [buck fush]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 18:55
>>>From what I understand a pedo is a head case. A lot of them believe sex with kids is Ok and natural and think the rest of us are nuts for being with people our own age.<<< Unfortunately, the law makes no distinction between a disgusting old man who rapes three-year-olds.... ...and a guy who had sex with a seventeen-year-old twenty years ago, when he was twenty and drunk. One is a pedophile, one made a mistake. But according to the law, both are sex offenders. If you can't see a difference.....well, you're part of the problem, aren't you? Lemme ask you a question--if you had sex with an eighteen-year-old girl who later turned out to be seventeen, and an overzealous prosecutor threw the book at you to "make you an example"--would that make you a pedophile, who was sick in the head and evil for the rest of your life? Or would it make you a victim of a self-righteous douchebag's arbitrary disregard for the spirit of the law? And how would the community see you?
From: barghest [buck fush]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 19:03
Further perspective on this issue: [actwin.com] The age of consent in Texas is 17, in Arkansas it's 16, in Florida it's 18. So, to give you some idea of how unreliable and arbitrary the age of consent is: If I have sex with a seventeen-year-old from Florida, I'm a filthy pedophile who is a sex offender and will be sick and evil for the rest of my life. If I have sex with the same seventeen-year-old after she moves down to Texas, I'm just a regular guy with a young girlfriend. But if I have sex with her sixteen-year-old sister, I'm a filthy pedophile--unless I wait until they move a few miles over and live in Arkansas, in which case, I'm just a normal guy who likes 'em young again. Oh, unless I'm under 24 years of age--in that case, I can have sex in Florida with all the sixteen-year-old girls I want. Sound fair to you?
From: boethius09
[Baker Girl]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 19:08
Barghest, I don't think this guy was just "young, dumb and full of cum"; while he may not have been fondling three year olds, it was probably not an honest mistake either. "DaiShin WolfHawk, 53, was known as John Joseph Lentini when he pleaded guilty in his native state of New York in 1983 to rape, attempted rape, sodomy and attempted sodomy." First off, he's an Italian guy pretending to be Native. Secondly, rape and sodomy are serious convictions, reserved for the worst sexually degrading acts that can be committed on another person. Third: you know he's a whack-job when he chooses to be called "DaiShin". Really.
From: barghest [buck fush]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 19:35
>>>Barghest, I don't think this guy was just "young, dumb and full of cum"; <<< But you don't know the facts, so you just assume whatever will get your blood pleasantly boiling, right? >>>First off, he's an Italian guy pretending to be Native. <<< Tell the Grand Wizard. >>>Secondly, rape and sodomy are serious convictions, reserved for the worst sexually degrading acts that can be committed on another person.<<< Don't know where the hell you got that silly idea. Consensual sex with a seventeen-year-old is legally considered Rape. And Sodomy can cover anything other than missionary-style sex with a member of the opposite sex. [rotten.com] You can get a Sodomy charge from getting a blowjob, if the prosecutor is a big enough douche. And if you're gay, ANYTHING you do can be considered Sodomy. When one law can be used to punish everything from a simple hetero blowjob to raping an underage drunk gay sheep, there's something seriously wrong with the system. Sad that you're too busy looking for a way to be pissed off at ethnic guys to see that.
From: wulfgartheblack [Wulfgar the Black]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 19:42
No kin of mine - Dog be thanked. Now, Tottenhawk . . .
From: boethius09
[Baker Girl]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 19:59
From: barghest [buck fush] Date: 11-Oct-2005 19:35 >>>Barghest, I don't think this guy was just "young, dumb and full of cum"; <<< >>But you don't know the facts, so you just assume whatever will get your blood pleasantly boiling, right? I don't think I'm the one who's looking to get my blood boiling. I think you are taking this far more seriously than me, as a matter of fact. I'm not sure what that whole Grand Wizard thing is that you were babbling about, some reference to God or George Bush? Barghest, you don't know the facts about this case, either, and you're getting into a froth over this article because YOU assume this guy's innocent. Assuming someone is innocent is usually reserved for before the trial; after he's been convicted and served his time, and doesn't even call himself innocent - well, to me that means he's guilty. I am sorry for making fun of his name. DaiShin sounds like a really awesome, unethnic name, and I will be sure to remember it when I have rugrats. I am very sorry that I accused him of misrepresenting his ethnic heritage, even though I thought it was funny at the time. All in all, I am very sorry that you identify with this convicted sex offender. Apparently this article hit a little close to home, no?
From: shit4brains
[tritium]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 20:02
tottenhawk must be busy watching rat patrol re-runs so I'll try to fill his combat boots. Fuckin indians no white people would do shit like this they need some police to kick some ass and this wouldn't happen.Hey fuck u shit4brans i'll kick your ass too u fag.
From: barghest [buck fush]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 20:23
>>>I don't think I'm the one who's looking to get my blood boiling. I think you are taking this far more seriously than me, as a matter of fact. <<< What can I say? Hypocrisy pisses me off. >>>I'm not sure what that whole Grand Wizard thing is that you were babbling about, some reference to God or George Bush? <<< You said the fact that he was an ethnic group you didn't like should be taken as evidence of his guilt. I'm making fun of you for being ignorant. >>>Barghest, you don't know the facts about this case, either, and you're getting into a froth over this article because YOU assume this guy's innocent.<<< No, I assume he could be innocent. I reserve judgement until I know all the facts--that's what smart people do. But if someone is stupid enough to get into a rabid froth, I will play devil's advocate to expose their stupidity while I wait. >>>Assuming someone is innocent is usually reserved for before the trial; after he's been convicted and served his time, and doesn't even call himself innocent - well, to me that means he's guilty. <<< Oh, of course, I forgot--the legal system is perfect, and no one is ever convicted of a crime they didn't commit. Silly me. >>>I am sorry for making fun of his name. <<< Are you sorry for trying to derail the argument by bringing up irrelevant prejudices? His name and where he is from have nothing to do with anything. >>>All in all, I am very sorry that you identify with this convicted sex offender. Apparently this article hit a little close to home, no?<<< Ah, there you go. Try to win the argument by implying anyone that disagrees with your ignorant, prejudiced ideas must be a child rapist. Did you attend the Fred Phelps school of debate? Dipshit.
From: boethius09
[Baker Girl]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 20:30
Oh, and which ethnic group did I say I didn't like? None. I didn't say anything bad about anyone's ethnic heritage. I didn't use slurs, I didn't call names. I made a joke. But I'm glad the PC police are on their way, anyway. I am innocent until proven guilty!
From: boethius09
[Baker Girl]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 20:33
>>But if someone is stupid enough to get into a rabid froth, I will play devil's advocate to expose their stupidity while I wait. << Heh heh... I love irony.
From: barghest [buck fush]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 20:38
It's okay. I know you only lash out at me because of the sexual tension. Some women get hot from arguing. It's no big deal.
From: wulfgartheblack [Wulfgar the Black]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 20:56
Tritium, A bit bland - needs some ? ? ? what, vitriol? Vain boast of hardware possessed? Ah! Claim of cock size!! Naw. Who'd think that was really him?
From: conspiracy
[Theory]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 23:51
I have looked and looked , but I cannot find the story .... it was 15 years ago , and I THINK Oregon ( not sure , but wife & brother remember the story also)..... An 18 year old was arrested , charged & listed forever as a sex offender , child molester , contributing to etc..... SHE WAS 3 MONTHS YOUNGER !!!! ( he had just turned 18 10 days before ... was caught in back seat at "a lovers lane" by police.) More info is needed about this story ...... My Two Cents
From: emperorwang
[Emperor Wang]
Date: 11-Oct-2005 23:57
Wow, 420, that was incredibly insightful. Thanks for the Springeresque reaction. I guess your Final Thought is next... unless that was your Final Thought, in which case, we can all breathe a sigh of relief. Your self-righteous charade doesn't set you apart from the kidfuckers, and you're both part of the problem.
From: towtenhak [Towtenhak]
Date: 12-Oct-2005 08:31
I tell you oncet it werent NO DAM HUMAN GRIL that done it. I no I seen em like it were yesterday n they dammit took my dam pants too leavin me NOTHIN.
From: anaisnun [Anais Nun]
Date: 12-Oct-2005 08:55
Sounds like someone's late for their nappie-nap.
From: 11b3vw8 [smell my finger]
Date: 12-Oct-2005 09:55
Age of consent in Arkansas is 16?! Hot damn.. I know what I'm doing tonight..
From: blissfulgirl
[~^-^~]
Date: 12-Oct-2005 10:05
conspiracy [Theory] there was a similar case in Alberta about 10 years back. The main difference was the guy was 3 years older than his girlfriend, who at the time of the sex was 3 weeks younger than the age of consent...3 weeks! They were both still teenagers and only 1 grade apart in school. The guy chose to plead guilty, same sort of thing...life long record, considered a registered sex offender and rapist. After the trial he and the girl issued a statement to the media...he made his guilty plea primarily to prevent her from having to testify publicly in court. They ended up getting married about 5 years after the trial. It came out during the trial that a jealous friend is the one who reported them to the police...and the prosecutors just ran with it. It's far too easy to make a snap judgment based on the vague information in this article. I'm still far more suspicious of why they took the first child (the article doesn't come out and clearly say why) and if this "couple" doesn't even live together (200 miles apart) and she lives with her own father who exactly are they protecting these kids from? Sounds to me like they are protecting them from their mother more so than their father.
From: richardcranium1 [Ben Dover]
Date: 12-Oct-2005 10:55
OK, Let me get this straight. The guy is a convicted sex offender. He has no job. He claims to be a part of a tribe not recognized by any state in the country? Wow...what a catch. I mean, forget the fact that he is a child molester...he sounds like a stable upstanding citizen!
From: bushhater69 [RANDY]
Date: 12-Oct-2005 11:33
Funny story, when I got out of the Navy, I was 21 and used to hang out at a foosball parlor. One nite I met the most beautiful girl I had ever seen and we got to talking and decided to go out the next nite. We went to several bars (the drinking age was 18) and I got carded at two while she never got carded at all. She was outdrinking me 2 to 1 and you couldn't even tell she was drinking at all. When I met her she told me she was 17 which was cool because the age of consent at that time was 16, and her mother ran a massage parlor at nite so she had no curfew. Later that nite she asked me to give her driving lessons which I agreed to and we subsequently got pulled over by the police. Back then they were not so strick on DUI so I was told to take the girl straight home and do the same myself. I found out two days later how old the girl really was. She was 13! Now, if I had had sex with her and gotten caught, I would now be a sex offender and hounded for the rest of my life. That's why I tend to take stories of "sex offenders" with a grain of salt. Just about anything now days can get you labeled a sex offender. Just something to think about.
From: buggerthis [buttercup]
Date: 12-Oct-2005 13:35
I can add to that too... Back in 81 I met this guy the day after my 16th birthday and we started dating a couple months later. He was 24 then and yes, we started having sex a few months into the relationship. If my parents REALLY wanted too - they could have pressed charges on him, easily... but they didn't. They met him and thought he was a nice guy and he was definately interested in my well being - not just my twat. He knew how old I was, but that didn't matter. Now, here we are... nearly 25 years later. We've been married for 21 years and have 2 great kids aged 18 and 16. We are extrememly happily married and still very much in love with each other. Half the time, I have to seriously think about our age difference to remember exactly how many years there are between us. I have another friend that a few years back was dating this girl. They were dating for a few months before her father found out. She had always maintained that she was 18 - then my friend found out that she was actually 15. AS SOON AS HE FOUND OUT, he broke it off with her. Never returned her numberous phone calls... never answered the letters she would leave on his car. She would camp out on his door step... even came after his new girlfriend (now wife) with a knife. She turned into this stalker girl. The way she got back at him was by telling her Daddy that they had sex. Daddy went to the police and had him arrested. He admitted to having sex with her, but told the court that it was consentual... the court ruled that a girl of 15 wasn't of the age that she could consent and he was convicted of child molestation. Now, it's been over 7 years since that happend. He has to register as a sex offender. He bought a house a while back and had to sell it a year later because one of his neighbors decided to open a daycare out of her home. He's not allowed to pick up his kids from school or go to parent teacher conferences. He can't go watch his kids play soccer or baseball... can't even take them to the library. And now - they are changing the laws in this city to the point where he is now going to have to sell is second home and move completely out of the city all together. It happens all the time. Sex offenders that rape or molest CHILDREN - cut their dicks off!! Charges of sex offense when teenagers are involved... I have to question.
From: sirbutlust
[mike duff]
Date: 12-Oct-2005 15:15
heres a fun fact about pennsylvania and another reason i glad i moved away from there after college. In pennsylvania if you live with a chick who has a kid for more than only three months you are considered common law and thus are vulnerable to having to pay child support for her kid that you didnt father. surprisingly a lot of the women know this but most guys dont as they know more about nascar and pot than legal stuff (other than gun laws and getting out of DUIS.) also considering half of every high school girl is pregnate out there or a single mother with no father to be found, there is many women desperate to find a dumbass man to live with them.
From: becky20 [rebecca]
Date: 12-Oct-2005 20:02
she chose to keep that baby therefor, its HERS and no one should have the right to take it from her.
From: rottenaugratin [Rotten au Gratin]
Date: 13-Oct-2005 08:39
Oh look, the child welfare system screws up yet another life. What a huge fucking surprise that is.
From: lollercaust [Lollercaust]
Date: 13-Oct-2005 09:51
"I am living every woman's worst nightmare that when your child is born and you close your eyes for one second, if that baby isn't sleeping on your chest, you open your eyes and that child isn't going to be there," I'm no mother, but isn't hearing that your daughter has been raped pretty high on the worst nightmare scale?
From: waterfay84 [waterfay84]
Date: 13-Oct-2005 10:24
Boo hoo, so sad the state is gonna take your kid away. Shouldn't have had a kid with a scumbag pedophile bitch.
From: livewire [richard cranium]
Date: 15-Oct-2005 10:51
WELL I'LL TELL YOU THIS TAKE LIKE YOU WANT IT BUT THIS IS WHAT I THINK ABOUT IT. THEY SHOULD HAVE NEVER LET THAT SICK FUCK OUT OF PRISON HELL HE SHOULD HAVE NEVER WENT AS SOON AS HE WAS CONVICTED THEY SHOULD HAVE BENT THAT TWISTED BICTH OVER PUT SOME SAND IN THE VASILINE FUCKED HIM RAW AND PUT A BULLIT IN HIS HEAD. THE WOMAN DOES NOT NEED TO BE AROUND HIM OR ANYTHING TO DO WITH HIM BECAUEAS THE COURT SYSTEM IS WATCHING THEM SO THEY CAN PUT HIM BACK IN PRISON AND MAKE MONEY OFF OF HIM BEING THERE. SHIT BESIDES THE POINT IF SE SHE WANTED TO BE WITH HIM KNOWING WHAT SHE KNOWES SHE IS JUST AS BAD AS HE IS THEN FUCK HER TO. BUNCH OF SICK FUCKING TWISTED UP SHIT BAGES THAT NEVER SHOULD HAVE BEEN BORN AND THEY WANT TO STOP ABORTION JUST TAKE THE BAD ONES. YOU KNOW WHAT CALL ME I'LL GIVE YOU $.75 FOR 2 BULLITS FUCK BOTH OF THEM . PEACE.
From: diamond47 [TK]
Date: 16-Oct-2005 05:56
Tis post is in response to "albinotreefrog"'s irresponsible post SO I GUESS WHEN THE BABY IS MOLESTED BY THE CREEP, WE SHOULD JUST SIT BACK AND LET IT HAPPEN? THE MOTHER IS TOO STUPID TO KNOW THAT THE REASON SHE IS PREGNANT WITH HIS CHILD IS TO FULFILL HIS SADISTIC SEXUAL NEEDS! HE WILL HAVE THE CHILD AT HIS DISPOSAL! MOST SEX OFFENDERS TAKE UP WITH WOMEN THAT HAVE CHILDREN OR CAN GIVE BIRTH TO A CHILD FOR EXACTLY THAT REASON...I CANNOT BELIEVE THE STUPIDITY OF SOME PEOPLE..THE CHILD IS IN DANGER, AND THE CHILD'S LIFE IS ALREADY RUINED IF IT IS ALLOWED TO BE AROUND THESE SICKOS, AND I DON'T CARE HOW LONG AGO HIS FIRST SEXUAL CRIME WAS COMMITTED. THEY NEVER STOP! From: albinotreefrog [life's funny like that] Date: 11-Oct-2005 16:24 there are alot of worse things than getting knocked up by a sex offender like getting knocked up by your mexican boyfriend like me for example i guess what it all comes down to is her own choice, if she trusts him enough then the damn people need to leave her alone...doesnt the government have better things to do than interfer with people lives nah i guess not...interfering with people lives is what the government does best
From: kar [karilea]
Date: 24-Oct-2005 11:41
The father is an admitted sex offender. He has done time for sex offenses. There have been other, not prosecuted, accusations that his own daughters were also sexually abused by him. The man also has changed his name and began claiming himself an indian. Yet no State or Government recognizes his "native tribe". I'm native and I can tell you that he is WHITE(this in and of itself shows that he is a liar and a fraud). The man also married a woman that may be 31 (and over twenty years his junior) but she looks like she's a teenager...which shows that he still has a proclevity towards the young. Check any half decent psychologist or psychiatrist and they will tell you that sex offenders can not be rehabilitated with any dependancey. The mother is an admitted drug abuser. Meth being the drug that stuck out with me. Crystal meth is not only dangerous to the abuser but also those that reside in the same house, as the chemicals can be quite damaging. That there is more to the story that may or may not surface, I am positive. The CPS can not state their side in the news due to privacy laws, so keep in mind you're only hearing the parents sob story and hardly the WHOLE STORY. I have faith that the State did exactly what they needed too, to protect those children.
Updated: 24-Oct-2005 11:41
| 
