|
What an asshole: Survivor winner shoots puppy with bow+arrow
Atlanta Journal-Constitution | Submitted by: dickrebel
"A winner of the Survivor TV show posted bond in Douglas County Wednesday on charges related to shooting a puppy with a bow and arrow and battery against his wife." ... "He thinks he can do anything. He thinks he invincible."
|
From: thefinn [Jon]
Date: 6-Jul-2006 17:21
Thats simply proof that all reality show exec's look for when it comes to show participants are people who are nothing but cocky assholes who will fight, bicker and in general make fools of themselves both off and on screen. why? because its what draws people back to watching. I hope this guy gets whats coming to him and we all get a reality check and remove reality TV from the air
From: fartsauce [Oopsie Poopsie]
Date: 6-Jul-2006 17:40
Personally I find the Survivor show a snooze-fest. I watched it a few times the 1st season but lost interest quick. Anyway I'd like to see someone test this flamer's "invincibility" with his own bow and arrow. If a bear or something that can kill you or your loved ones is coming at you aggressively then sure, shoot it, do whatever you have to to defend you and yours. To shoot a puppy makes you a total assbag in my book. Hope your wife leaves you and you lose all the money you made on Survivor.
From: wackojacko8 [WTF?]
Date: 6-Jul-2006 17:51
A man appears on SURVIVOR and he thinks he owns the universe, they should tie this fucktwat to a tree and fire arrows at him with a crossbow. To avenge the puppy god damnit......
From: aulduron
[Aulduron]
Date: 6-Jul-2006 17:57
You can equate it to seeing a kid go across your property and beating the heck out of him," Copeland said. I seriously hope this fucker never has kids then.
From: slaughter666 [I am Abomination]
Date: 6-Jul-2006 18:30
*gasp* puppy?.... is there pictures?
From: darkshadow [Dahhkness]
Date: 6-Jul-2006 18:40
Yeah, this is horrible and all, but it's even more horrible that reality shows are watched by people. That's the REAL crime here.
From: wolfmoosepigchicken [wolfmoosepigchicken]
Date: 6-Jul-2006 19:10
Wouldn't it be funny if he was singing the Survivor song while he aimed? Ooh-liioo-liioo-oaiiiooo! Poor puppy though.
From: darkshadow [Dahhkness]
Date: 6-Jul-2006 20:11
From: wolfmoosepigchicken [wolfmoosepigchicken] Date: 6-Jul-2006 19:10 Wouldn't it be funny if he was singing the Survivor song while he aimed? ------------ Funny is knowing the Survivor song.
From: lordpakul [Lord Pakul]
Date: 6-Jul-2006 20:39
The notable asshole, Brian Heidik:  http://www.tmz.com/2006/07/05/survivor-winner-arrested/ I wonder if he would survive an archery "accident"? This guy apparently did:  http://www.ogrish.com/archives/archery_accident_turkey_Jun_29_2006.html
From: biro
[yes?]
Date: 6-Jul-2006 21:08
Fucking asshole. Why doesn't that stupid wife of his just leave that douchebag already? He's a cocky asshole who beats her up and shoots defenseless puppies. Give 'em the old Lorena Bobbitt then leave!
From: selfcleaning [buttocks]
Date: 6-Jul-2006 21:55
His wife is quite bangable: http://www.in-focus.co.uk/search.cfm?category=enttain&name=CC+HEIDIK
From: eauclaireliberal [eauclaireliberal]
Date: 6-Jul-2006 22:59
I envision that scene in Goodfellas where Henry Hill (Ray Liota) pistol whips a preppie. That's what this asshole needs. A good pistol whipping.
From: capitalistswine
[Walter O'Dim]
Date: 6-Jul-2006 23:35
Is it possible the dog wouldn't of been shot if the owners had been responsible to not let the dog run at large? Where's the misdemeanor charges for allowing a dog to run at large? Crucify him all you want, but the fault lies with the owner of the dogs. Any dog that enters into my property is subject to being destroyed by me.
From: thebluebelly [Boo]
Date: 7-Jul-2006 00:50
"Bruno Heidick, the father of Brian Heidik, said by telephone that his son told him he thought the dog was a fox or coyote." Uh, yeah, I always make that mistake too. Mistaking a 12-16 week old puppy for a fox or coyote. Especially when I'm about a foot away. Fucktard needs to be shot through the eye with a bow and arrow.
From: acrimony
[Room Dz-015]
Date: 7-Jul-2006 01:01
God. I hate Survivor, I hate the idiots on suvivor and I fucking hate this guy. Shooting a puppy with a fucking bow and arrow what the fucking fuck? Even his picture looks smarmy.
From: haalonbaalona [AKA MrsSumDumFuk]
Date: 7-Jul-2006 02:35
The notable asshole, Brian Heidik: -------------------------------------------------- He should be euthanized for that bleach job. And, he's married? To a woman? From the look of things may I ask WHY?
From: blahblahblowme
[my inner child is a mean lil fucker]
Date: 7-Jul-2006 03:46
nail his nut sack to the floor in a corner and throw him a butter knife. Sing the survivor song as you load arrows into the compound bow one by one. Damn look I missed! Well let's see how number two does... right before you run out of arrows, put one right between his eyes...and go... "so how was it? How did you fucking like that?!" 
From: ozymandias [King of Kings]
Date: 7-Jul-2006 03:59
The puppy was charging him. He had to defend himself... it was either him or the puppy. Puppy related injury of citizens up 15% in the US last year alone. He just had to show that mean ass puppy the arrow of his ways. Woo hoo!
From: thanatos [Eris]
Date: 7-Jul-2006 05:54
A good old fashioned ass whipping would cure this guy.
From: capitalistswine
[Walter O'Dim]
Date: 7-Jul-2006 07:30
From: scarfface [Schmutamongus]
Date: 7-Jul-2006 00:09
uh... if there wuz an owner... From the article: "The 12- to 16-week-old dog was shot below the rib cage, said Chuck Brawn of the Douglas animal control office. The injuries were not life-threatening and the owner was expected to pick up the dog Thursday morning, officials said." Where are the charges against the owner for allowing the dog running at large?
From: capitalistswine
[Walter O'Dim]
Date: 7-Jul-2006 07:32
Irresponsible property ownership/management allowed this to happen. If anybody should be punished, it's the owner. Seems the owner might have learned a lesson when his property received an arrow through it's midsection.
From: mongolman [Em Bee]
Date: 7-Jul-2006 08:08
Never bring a puppy to a bow and arrow fight.
From: rottenaugratin
[Rotten au Gratin]
Date: 7-Jul-2006 09:43
Oh yeah. We're all just HUGELY shocked and horrified that someone from survivor could turn out to be a complete freak. Really. Just shocked. Because reality tv is where you find all the upstanding, calm, intelligent, normal, every-day folks. [Warning: this comment may drip due to excess sarcasm]
From: pimple [on the ass of life]
Date: 7-Jul-2006 11:12
all those reality shows suck big time. very boring, melodramatic waste of space. I saw an episode once, and a thought occured to me as I watched it: how amazing that the camera is always there, when something "important" happens. Turns out all that shit is fake anyway, they "stage" & "re-enact" certain things for interest. they're worse than soap operas. By the way, poor little dog. The asshole should get shot with an arrow.
From: pbrmeasap [Bob Dobbs]
Date: 7-Jul-2006 11:47
I would love to personally beat that useless fuckball to within an inch of his miserable life.
From: ltjackboot
[name]
Date: 7-Jul-2006 12:35
RE:From: wackojacko8 [WTF?] Date: 6-Jul-2006 17:51 A man appears on SURVIVOR and he thinks he owns the universe, they should tie this fucktwat to a tree and fire arrows at him with a crossbow. To avenge the puppy god damnit...... -But slowly, starting with the top of the foot-each side. then throught the shins-both. then through the back of 1 knee-so he has no excuse for sitting. then 2 or 3 in the boootoks and 1 in the scrotum. then bathe the fucker in rock salt and horse manure. It should take days for him to die in the sun. Sorry, but when it comes to torture I can get carried away.
From: heywood [Jablowme]
Date: 7-Jul-2006 12:51
My puppy is sweet, loving, and cute. I'm glad he hasn't been shot with an arrow. Or anything else. He is a furry, little pug. Here is a picture of a puggy being impaled by something other than an arrow: 
From: mike2039 [mike]
Date: 7-Jul-2006 12:52
From: capitalistswine [Walter O'Dim] Date: 7-Jul-2006 07:30 From: scarfface [Schmutamongus] Date: 7-Jul-2006 00:09 uh... if there wuz an owner... From the article: "The 12- to 16-week-old dog was shot below the rib cage, said Chuck Brawn of the Douglas animal control office. The injuries were not life-threatening and the owner was expected to pick up the dog Thursday morning, officials said." Where are the charges against the owner for allowing the dog running at large? I can hear it now, this evil man shot a puppy. I can understand his frustration though. What he should have done was went over to his neighbors house, took the dog owner to his house, and rubbed the offending neighbors nose in a pile of the dog's shit.
From: misterjeff [(actually it's Steve)]
Date: 7-Jul-2006 13:22
This guy must be a lousy shot if he can't kill a puppy with an arrow while standing a foot away from it. Did anybody else also notice this 'used car salesman/part time actor's' filmorgraphy? "Virgins of Sherwood Forest and "Chick Street Fighter"? Those sound like pornos to me...
From: dirtylittlegirl [Rori]
Date: 7-Jul-2006 18:22
i wanna vote him off this island. yay or nay?
From: scarfface
[Schmutamongus]
Date: 7-Jul-2006 19:29
I am survivor, see me gore A puppy loose, I can't ignore And she knows too much to go back an' pretend 'cause I shot its cowering ass Shivering right there on the grass No pup is gonna crap my lawn again.... CHORUS I am strong (strong) I am invincible (invincible) I'm survivor... (dipshit)
From: julezeebub [jules]
Date: 7-Jul-2006 20:05
Since there's not much else to do, I'll throw my two cents in on this issue: Yes, if the owners kept their dog at home, it wouldn't have happened. Doesn't change the fact that shooting a puppy, or a cat, or a horse, whatever--is lame. I'm talking domesticated pet-type animals, not wild game. I have no problem with hunting, and it's a whole nuther issue. Anyway, the dog didn't know from rules and regulations. It was doing what it does, following it's nose, not hurting anybody. Big hero can't wing a rock at it or just chase it off, oh no. Let's really hurt it. This kind of behavior isn't even evil. It's wussy, low-rent wanna-be evil, deserving of nothing but contempt. Back in the Before Times, I watched the bored kids in my drivers-ed class torment a beetle. It had flipped on it's back, and they amused themselves by tossing gravel at it. Every time it managed to get to it's feet, one of the guys would go over and flip it on it's back again and they'd go back to their game. These are good-sized beetles by the way. Big enough to toy with. (I don't know why the article is reminding me of this incident, but it does.) I finally got irritated enough to go over, pick up the beetle and toss it into the bushes, muttering about how some people got their kicks. I think it's on my mind because it was L.A.M.E., just like this guy's behavior, and I hate that lame-ass shit. Ah yes, young ones, we geezers and geezerettes have many stories, and it's hard to tell them from our many soapboxes. If you don't know what a soapbox is, feel free to ask.
From: julezeebub [jules]
Date: 8-Jul-2006 00:07
Yes, I do have a problem with shooting a deer in the guts. A gut-shot deer is wasted meat. Aesthetics? No. I think dogs and deer are equally beautiful, thank you. Whether dog is as tasty as venison, I don't know. What I wrote is my opinion, not a legal argument. I appreciate your taking the time to attempt this dissection, though. Are you a law student? (By the way, it's spelled irrelevant.) I agree on the animal-rights line. Are you asking if I think he would have been evil if he had killed the dog outright? No. In your earlier post you said "I can hear it now, this evil man shot a puppy. I can understand his frustration though. What he should have done was went over to his neighbors house, took the dog owner to his house, and rubbed the offending neighbors nose in a pile of the dog's shit. " I had the urge to clarify that I find the guy a world-class loser, but not evil. If he had killed the pup outright, I could at least respect his archery ability, since bow-hunting takes a certain amount of skill. I notice you didn't defend his actions, just his frustration. Man, you must have had some time to kill, too! Irrelevant, indeed. Hell, this whole thing is irrelevant.
From: sheik [Yerbouti]
Date: 8-Jul-2006 01:01
He should have raped the puppy. That would have added an extra dimension of Rottenness(tm) to this story.
From: aulduron
[Aulduron]
Date: 8-Jul-2006 01:23
I have to agree that he's not evil, just a pussy. I love dogs, but I agree that when they're alone on somebody elses property they have the right to shoot it. That doesn't mean you're not a pussy for shooting it though. It's only a puppy and I doubt it's even capable of doing much damage. I'm probably the biggest enemy on this board to the Animal Rights people, but there's a huge difference between shooting someones pet and shooting your food.
From: mike2039 [mike]
Date: 8-Jul-2006 07:04
Well it is just a puppy and it probably is harmless other than the fact that it is a shit machine. I guess if you are really really tired of your neigbor's puppy shitting in your yard, there is only one solution. When the puppy finds its way to your yard late at night, beckon it and offer a treat. While the puppy is munching on the treat, you can grab it by the snout with you stronger hand. Brace the dogs shoulder agianst your knee and violently twist. If you were sucessful, you should have head a popping sound. If not, it will have stunned the dog. While the dog is laying there, stomp on it's ripcage right behind it's front paws. Regardless of what technic you had to use to rid yourself of the shit machine, the injuries will be consistant with the mutt being hit by a car. If you follow these steps, you should carry the mutts carcass to the road. That will make poeple not ask any questions.
From: capitalistswine
[Walter O'Dim]
Date: 8-Jul-2006 08:23
From: julezeebub [jules]
Date: 8-Jul-2006 00:07
Yes, I do have a problem with shooting a deer in the guts. A gut-shot deer is wasted meat.
Aesthetics? No. I think dogs and deer are equally beautiful, thank you. Whether dog is as tasty as venison, I don't know. So what's your issue with shooting a dog in the guts? Shouldn't really be a big deal, after all you don't eat dog. (By the way, it's spelled irrelevant.) Ad hominem. I agree on the animal-rights line. Are you asking if I think he would have been evil if he had killed the dog outright? No. In your earlier post you said "I can hear it now, this evil man shot a puppy. I can understand his frustration though. What he should have done was went over to his neighbors house, took the dog owner to his house, and rubbed the offending neighbors nose in a pile of the dog's shit. " Um, that quote wasn't me. That quote is attributed to Scarfface. But I am asking; if he had killed the dog if your opinion would of changed from low-rent, wanna-be evil to something else entirely? I had the urge to clarify that I find the guy a world-class loser, but not evil. If he had killed the pup outright, I could at least respect his archery ability, since bow-hunting takes a certain amount of skill. Agreed, from five feet away his poor shooting is humorous. I notice you didn't defend his actions, just his frustration. Man, you must have had some time to kill, too! Irrelevant, indeed. Hell, this whole thing is irrelevant. If you go back to an earlier post of mine, I did defend his actions as it pertains to property rights.
From: julezeebub [jules]
Date: 8-Jul-2006 10:42
Ad hominem? Wrong again, but thanks for playing! If the guy had killed the puppy, he would, in my opinion, be a mean little creep. I would avoid his company. I am sorry about attributing that quote to you. I guess I was having too much fun to pay attention... Anyway, I'm off to the new stuff!
From: scarfface
[Schmutamongus]
Date: 9-Jul-2006 11:56
From: capitalistswine [Walter O'Dim] [Are you asking if I think he would have been evil if he had killed the dog outright? No. In your earlier post you said "I can hear it now, this evil man shot a puppy. I can understand his frustration though. What he should have done was went over to his neighbors house, took the dog owner to his house, and rubbed the offending neighbors nose in a pile of the dog's shit. " ] "Um, that quote wasn't me. That quote is attributed to Scarfface. But I am asking; if he had killed the dog if your opinion would of changed from low-rent, wanna-be evil to something else entirely? " Twasn't me... twas mike 2039. Despite the tone of many of my posts, I'm pretty tolerant of stuff like this - and bend over backwards to cut puppies and neighbors slack. For the record, though, I think dogs are stupid, smelly, disgusting, shit-eating things in general. But it's not their fault... they come out that way.
Updated: 15-Jul-2006 14:56
| 
